Gun Control Laws Should Be Stricter - Read a Free Law.
The government has the ability to enforce more laws so they can reduce the number of guns on the streets. The government also needs to take steps to reduce the amount of guns being made, and mainly who has them (Jacobs 1-3). Today's crimes are becoming more violent that ever because of the widespread use of guns.
More rules against who can have guns will make society safer by decreasing the number of drive by shootings and accidental shootings and save lives. These regulations will also prevent many homicides and mass shootings.
The Gun Control Debate: Stricter Gun Laws Will Reduce Gun Violence. Abstract. This paper will argue that stricter gun laws have the capacity to reduce gun violence rates. Over the past few years, there have been extensive debates about whether the United States should adopt stricter gun control measures.
Gun control laws do not reduce crime rate because gun control laws don’t reduce crimes, gun control laws are unconstitutional because they violate our second amendment, and mandatory sentences for people who commit gun-related crimes are a better alternative than gun control itself. (tags: Firearm, Crime, Gun politics in the United States).
Economist John Lott, in his book More Guns, Less Crime, provides data showing that laws allowing law-abiding citizens to carry a gun legally in public may cause reductions in crime because potential criminals do not know who may be carrying a firearm.
Many people believe that stricter gun control laws will solve many of this countries crime issues, but it will not save lives, public places are less safe without concealed weapons, and they will not reduce crime.
Essay The United States Should Strict Stricter Gun Laws. not, the United States should enforce stricter gun laws. Due to increase gun violence over the years the argument has become, whether or not states should have stricter gun laws. Throughout politics it is a well debated topics, with people defending each side for various reasons.